Process DMCA request

2016-08-18-PokeMobBot-counternotice.md

@@ -0,0 +1,55 @@
+MobBotTeam   
+[private]
+
+Dear Github,
+
+I have read and understand GitHub's Guide to Filing a DMCA Counter Notice.
+and am including this statement as proof and as required.
+
+This letter is a formal response to a claim of copyright infringement
+against our Github repo that may be found at the following address :
+
+https://github.com/MobBotTeam/PokeMobBot
+
+I swear under penalty of perjury, that i have a good-faith belief that the
+material was removed or disabled as a result of a mistake or
+misidentification of the material to be removed or disabled.
+
+Our project is licensed under AGPLv3, and projects from which we have taken
+code are licensed under GPLv3. We have fully complied with all licensing
+requirements from said projects.
+
+I have good reason to believe that the Initial DMCA Notice was erroneously
+filed as a result of internal issues within the previous projects.
+PokeMobBot and NecroBot first were only NecroBot, until the developement
+team split into both projects as a result of the expulsion of Necronomicon.
+Necronomicon then moved on to create "NecroBot", which actually took code
+from PokeMobBot to include it in NecroBot. An example would be as follows :
+
+https://github.com/PocketMobsters/PokeMobBot/pull/378/files  
+The above link is a pull request from an original piece of code from
+PokeMobBot.
+
+https://github.com/NECROBOTIO/NecroBot/commit/b968fa24fb920deeed3e77dc535761dad832e602   
+The above link is the same code taken by NecroBot, without attribution,
+nine hours after our initial pull request.
+
+Another example of such would be their Readme file. They demonstrate being
+licensed as AGPLv3, yet their license file is GPLv3.
+This is due to them ripping off our very own Readme without verification.
+Hence, their GPLv3 license is void.
+
+Multiple instances of such have happened. Most code of NecroBot and
+PokeMobBot are extremely similar or the same due to cases such as above or
+the initial split otherwise.
+
+Hence, i re-state that i have good reason to believe that the initial DMCA
+Notice is false, and was only filed in order to sabotage our project.
+
+I consent to the jurisdiction of Federal District Court for the judicial
+district in which my address is located (if in the United States, otherwise
+the Northen District of California where GitHub is located), and i will
+accept service of process from the person who provided the DMCA
+notification or agent of such person.
+
+[private]