Process DMCA request

2015-09-24-wahoo-counternotice.md

@@ -0,0 +1,73 @@
+*I have read and understand GitHub's Guide to Filing a DMCA Counter Notice.*
+
+This is a DMCA counter notice for the following repositories:
+
+- https://github.com/oh-my-fish/oh-my-fish
+
+and forks:
+
+- https://github.com/derekstavis/oh-my-fish
+
+- https://github.com/jeremiejig/oh-my-fish
+
+- https://github.com/tcoenraad/oh-my-fish
+
+- https://github.com/Pyppe/oh-my-fish
+
+- https://github.com/icyleaf/oh-my-fish
+
+- https://github.com/coderstephen/oh-my-fish
+
+- https://github.com/gretel/oh-my-fish
+
+- https://github.com/joseluisq/oh-my-fish
+
+- https://github.com/nwykes/oh-my-fish
+
+- https://github.com/scorphus/oh-my-fish
+
+- https://github.com/WandersonCF/oh-my-fish
+
+- https://github.com/wk/oh-my-fish
+
+
+The copy of the takedown request is here:
+https://github.com/github/dmca/blob/master/2015-09-22-wahoo.md
+
+
+The takedown request claims that these repositories have part of the
+"wahoo" source code but this code was introduced by @bucaran on a Pull
+Request. His Pull Request introduced a License change that was not
+explicitly approved by all contributors and this change has been reverted.
+
+Most of the files since the merge have already been totally modified and do
+not have any similarity to the code that was merged. So if he wants to
+remove the code that was added with his PR, he may do so by opening another
+PR. Even so, the MIT license is permissive and allows for this kind of use:
+http://opensource.org/licenses/MIT
+
+> On August 26, 2015, I, @bucaran, and "oh-my-fish" collaborators, led by
+@bpinto, decided to replace the entire source code of "oh-my-fish!"
+
+This is not true, which other collaborator has approved? We have over 50+
+contributors on oh-my-fish and as far as I recall, none has approved (PR
+has been deleted so I can't confirm).
+
+> Soon after the merge and due to conflicts with @bpinto regarding the
+direction of the project and other issues, we decided to not continue
+working together and ended our relationship. I would return to "wahoo" and
+@bpinto would return to the original "oh-my-fish", still available at
+
+This is not true either. He moved the repository to his own private
+organisation and then destroyed the repository. He said in a future message
+that Github restored his destroyed repository.
+
+I swear under the penalty of perjury that this information is accurate and
+the material was removed or disabled as a result of a mistake or
+misidentification.
+
+I consent to the to the jurisdiction of Federal District Court for the
+judicial district of California to accept service of process from the
+person who provided notification or their agent.
+
+[PRIVATE]